PLS PLS PLS HELP ON GEOMETRY PLS

Ignoring those who said they weren't sure, there were 297 men asked, and 183 said yes, they had driven a car when they probably

USPshnik [31]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.616-0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{297}}}=3.998$

$p_v =2*P(z>3.998)=0.0000639$

With the most common significance levels used $\alpha= 0.1, 0.05, 0.01$ we see that the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can say that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=297 represent the random sample of male taken

X=183 represent the men who said yes, they had driven a car when they probably had too much alcohol

$\hat p=\frac{183}{297}=0.616$ estimated proportion of men who said yes, they had driven a car when they probably had too much alcohol

$p_o=0.5$ is the value that we want to test

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Hypothesis to test

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the majority of men in the population (that is, more than half) would say that they had driven a car when they probably had too much alcohol, and the system of hypothesis are:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.5$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.5$

The statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

After replace we got:

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.616-0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{297}}}=3.998$

Decision

We have a right tailed test so then the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z>3.998)=0.0000639$

With the most common significance levels used $\alpha= 0.1, 0.05, 0.01$ we see that the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can say that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.5

7 0

3 years ago

Susie has $2 in coins in her purse. She has 3 times as many quarters as nickels. She has twice as many dimes as nickels. How man

zysi [14]

Answer:

120 coins our in her purse if the 2 dollar factor is made up of nickels

8 0

3 years ago

Help me i dong get this that much

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

ye

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

(Congruent polygons)

olasank [31]

1. is line FG
2. is line IH
3. is angle J
4. is angle H
5. is 12 cm.
6. is 4 cm.
7. is 135
8. is 150
9. sorry can't help you on this one.
10. is 150+90+90=330

7 0

3 years ago

Consider the following quadratic function Part 3 of 6: Find the x-intercepts. Express it in ordered pairs.Part 4 of 6: Find the

maksim [4K]

Answer:

The line of symmetry is x = -3

Explanation:

Given a quadratic function, we know that the graph is a parabola. The general form of a parabola is:

$y=ax^2+bx+c$

The line of symmetry coincides with the x-axis of the vertex. To find the x-coordinate of the vertex, we can use the formula:

$x_v=-\frac{b}{2a}$

In this problem, we have:

$y=-x^2-6x-13$

Then:

a = -1

b = -6

We write now:

$x_v=-\frac{-6}{2(-1)}=-\frac{-6}{-2}=-\frac{6}{2}=-3$

Part 3:

For this part, we need to find the x-intercepts. This is, when y = 0:

$-x^2-6x-13=0$

To solve this, we can use the quadratic formula:

$x_{1,2}=\frac{-(-6)\pm\sqrt{(-6)^2-4\cdot(-1)\cdot(-13)}}{2(-1)}$

And solve:

$x_{1,2}=\frac{6\pm\sqrt{36-52}}{-2}$ $x_{1,2}=\frac{-6\pm\sqrt{-16}}{2}$

Since there is no solution to the square root of a negative number, the function does not have any x-intercept. The correct option is ZERO x-intercepts.

Part 4:

To find the y intercept, we need to find the value of y when x = 0: