I also need help with this question
The faulty logic in this sentence is an example of an either-or-fallacy. Given the construction of this type of fallacy it posits that the potential outcomes of a situation are usually a singular event such as in this example the only result is a prolonged strike and it will be economically crippling, this may happen but a variety of options could happen as well.
When trust has been broken or altered in a friendship, it is important that the person who broke their friends trust apologizes and makes sure that they are stable enough to not make the same decisions again. they must make sure they communicate how they feel about the situation, including the person who was hurt. it is hard to be a perfect friend, and we all make mistakes. as long as a friend knows that there will not be another again and that they are remorseful and sorry for their actions, and there is good change shown in their behavior then it is okay to assume friendship again
