Some might say FDR, some might say LBJ, others might say Nixon. The reality is that the power of the Legislative vis a vis the Executive is in constant flux.
In terms of sweeping policy initiatives FDR's administration might be the time when the Presidency took on many of its contemporary roles. The activism of the LBJ administration was a further expansion of the New Deal-era role of the FDR administration. LBJ also was arguably the first president to use the US armed forces in foreign engagements without Congress declaring war (Gulf of Tonkin resolution)--a precedent we have become all too familiar with. In terms of 'imperial pretensions' Nixon assumed all the New Deal, Great Society, civil rights activism, and the ability to intervene militarily of the preceding Presidencies and expanded them to include unfettered use of the CIA and FBI.
Answer:
because persia was a larger empire and was probably better but Athens and Sparta and some other Greek city-states helped and they had the advantage because they knew the geography of the land and the element of surprise.
Answer:
Some white people didn't want their kids going to school with black kids, so they moved
Explanation:
In the face of all these events of the century, the United States remained intelligent, providing weapons in the war, another making allies to remain victorious. Among all these moments in history, the United States remained one step ahead in strategic terms, of what could happen next and how to make the error something that could benefit it. In this sense, I believe that all events have made the United States become a world power through strategic acts.
It led to the American Colonies being taxed heavily by the King.
-taxes
-standing armies
- quartering of soldiers without permission
