The question above has incomplete statement it lacks certain given choices. with this i made a research about the question and it turns out that the answer of the question in the items that save you money by allowing you to pay a relatively low price for a good or service is comparative shopping.
"research industry standards" is the answer i believe
Answer:
The plant would have to work 8.33 hours
Explanation:
Initial productivity:
100 parts were produced in 1 hour
Percentage increase in productivity = 20%
New productivity:
100 + (100 × 0.2) = 100 + 20 = 120
120 parts would be produced in 1 hour
Number of hours the plant would have to work to produce 1000 parts = 1000/120 = 8.33 hours
Answer:
- The adjustment causes an increase in an asset account and an increase in a revenue account.
- Accounts receivable is usually increased when accruing revenues.
- They refer to revenues that are earned in a period, but have not been received and are unrecorded.
- They refer to earnings which have been earned but not yet billed.
Explanation:
Accrued revenue refers to cash earned for selling a good or delivering a service yet the cash has not been received and the transaction was not recorded in the books as revenue. This means that the cash has been earned but it has not been billed to the customer it was earned from.
When the books are being adjusted for this, the accounts receivable - which is an asset account - will increase to show that cash is owed. Revenue will also increase as this was cash earned from delivering a good or service.
Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help
