The answer in this question is the foot-in-the-door phenomenon which is the first one in the choices. The results of this experiment that the researchers conducted support the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. The foot-in-the-door phenomenon is one that is supported by the result of this experiment.
Answer:
First option will be recommended.
Explanation:
To determine which option to be taken, we calculate the net present value each option generates. The option generating higher NPV should be recommended.
- Net present value of first option = Lump sum receipt = $150,000.
- Net present value of second option will be found by discounting cash flows at investing rate 12% and calculated as followed:
+ Present value of 20 equal annual payment of $14,000 + Present value of $60,000 paid in 20 years = (14,000/12%) x [ 1 - 1.12^(-20)] + 60,000/1.12^20 = $110,792.
As net present value of the first option is higher than the second option, first option will be recommended.
Answer:
I have solved part a) because question contains only part a) however it has 3 more parts as well but that are not mentioned in the question. Part a) is explained below.
Explanation:
a) The distribution should be right skewed as most of the numbers lies at that side while using the median to correctly represent an observation in the distribution.
To represent the variability of the observations, interquartile range could be used. Since, there is a good number of expensive houses and this would increase the mean and standard deviation. So, it is better to use interquartile range to represent it, i.e. upper quartile for expensive houses, and lower quartile for less expensive houses and middle quartile for mid-range priced houses.
Answer:
I think I think it will be 2:35 or 2:50
<em>Patents protected inventors and let them profit from their inventions</em>
<em>~Luis~</em>
