<u>Answer:</u>
Puritans were protestors in 16th and 17th century who scared people with their sermons.
<u>Explanation:</u>
“Sermon” is a religious talk given in church. Puritans wanted to purify the ''Church of England'' from the ''Roman catholic practices''. They observed that there is a decrease in the number of religious devotees of ''second-generation'' settlers. To increase this, they 'preached' a type of sermon called "jeremiad". This sermon basically wanted to scare people by stating that if anyone committed any sin, they would be tortured and burnt in hell.
By all this, people would remain Puritan and believe in God and Church.
Answer: 3quatrains and 1 couplet.
Explanation:
Unlike the petrachan sonnet, the English is divided into four subgroups...that is, three quatrains. (A four line stanza) and 1 couplet (a two line stanza)
<span>Break it off—quickly!
Since it is revealed that the Duke was responsible for the murder of his first wife because he thought that she smiled at too many other men that weren't him, it would be wise to advice the Count to break off the marriage before the Duke could murder his daughter. </span>
Assuming
that ‘mine’ was underlined, then it is a personal pronoun.
<span>A
pronoun is used to substitute a noun. In order for it to substitute, it must
have a clear antecedent. Personal pronouns are used to substitute nouns with
ownership. There are three persons point of view.1st person is when
the subject is the one who is speaking (e.g. I, me, my, mine, we, us, our, ours). 2nd person is
when the subject is the one being spoken to (you, your, yours). 3rd person is when the subject is
the one spoken about (he, him, his,
she, her, hers, it, its, they, their, theirs).</span>
Answer:
.d. He will think that cheating is a morally justifiable behavior.
Explanation:
John is caught cheating on an assignment that is a clear violation of school policy. He suffers no consequence. From a social cognitive perspective, John will believe cheating is morally justifiable because he suffered no consequence from the previous wrongdoing he engaged himself in.
If John was made to face disciplinary measures as a result of his cheating, he would have acknowledged and seen his wrong and understand that there are consequences for cheating but as he faced no consequences, he believes what he did was morally acceptable.
