Answer:
True
Explanation:
Accountability on employees should be imbibe to ascertain if they are adhering to the security policies, reporting such cases would enable disciplinary actions to be taken so as to tackle the issues of workers, the measurements will be allowed for the reduction of risk. it is very important because a company can be performing even while at risk for example a company whose confidential lock is faulty without the person in charge reporting it on-time could lead to loss of important information to an unknown hands which can reduce the company performance.
The answers is the degree of interference, but it is not their so this would most likely fall under A, THE DEGREE OF DAMAGE OR LOSS.
Hope this helps :)
The correct answer is B; They allow multiple law enforcement agencies to combine their intelligence, resources, and personnel to target a specific problem.
Further Explanation:
Task forces are put together and used by numerous local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. There are many reasons this is done such as combining all the resources into one unit, having more personnel to work on the cases, and having more resources to get the cases solved. Task forces are put together for missing persons, murder cases, unsolved crimes, and drug cases.
When there is more than one jurisdiction involved the task force is more likely to be started. This is also beneficial for long term cases so that they don't have to work short staffed and have just the one case to focus on. Tasks forces will always have experts for different things so that the expertise is used to their advantage.
Learn more about task forces at brainly.com/question/12394318
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Otonomi dalam manajemen pada dasarnya berarti memberikan banyak kebebasan untuk membuat pilihan di tempat kerja. Seorang manajer yang memberikan otonomi karyawan biasanya menguraikan tujuan suatu proyek tetapi memungkinkan karyawan untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk mencapai tujuan itu.
2. Otonomi daerah memiliki keunggulan dalam memberikan kewenangan kebijaksanaan dan inovasi kepada daerah, memungkinkan perwakilan yang lebih besar dalam proses pengaturan daerah, dan membangun keadilan hukum yang lebih baik. Kelemahan ini memicu penyimpangan oleh kepala daerah sehingga mereka terseret ke dalam kasus hukum, dan memperbesar potensi konflik kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah
3.
Ada dua aliran utama penelitian yang mengevaluasi hubungan antara manusia
praktik dan kinerja sumber daya. Yang pertama adalah universalisme atau "praktik terbaik"
pendekatan. Mereka yang menggunakan pendekatan ini menunjuk ke temuan dukungan berulang untuk menunjukkan
bahwa beberapa praktik SDM, seperti intensitas perekrutan, peluang karier internal,
penilaian kinerja, sistem pelatihan formal, pembagian keuntungan, dan kompensasi insentif
didokumentasikan dengan sangat baik dalam berbagai konteks untuk menunjukkan bahwa ada universalitasnya
