Answer:
Social conventional reasoning
Explanation:
Social conventional reasoning is common among adults and adolescents. This kind of reasoning is based on judging the level of morality of a action by comparing with the expectations or views of the society. an individual's obedience to rules are not based on moral reasoning but based on what the society expects.
Fernando's reasoning is conventional because he focuses on the rules of the society to control his behavior.
I believe it was, "<span>Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." But I'm not quite sure. </span>
The approach to <u>moral-rights ethics</u> will be used when a decision is deemed immoral because it violates someone’s right.
<h3>What is moral-rights ethics?</h3>
A moral rights is concerned with the belief of what is morally good and bad and morally right and wrong
The ethics of moral rights seeks to establish a guideline of how moral right will be pursued.
In conclusion, the approach to <u>moral-rights ethics</u> will be used when a decision is deemed immoral because it violates someone’s right.
Read more about moral-rights ethics
<em>brainly.com/question/18401975</em>
Answer:
A person who represents our country or state
Explanation:
Ramona's behavior reflects diffusion of responsibility.
This term refers to the fact that individuals are less likely to do something and offer somebody help if they are located in large crowds. If they are surrounded by other people who are also not doing anything to help, these individuals are unlikely to do something about the problem either because they are hoping someone else will do it for them.
