Answer:
D. Both (B) and (C) are true
Explanation:
Cash payback approach is helpful to know the number of years, project would take to recover the initial investment. It could be calculated by dividing initial investment by cash flow per year. It is very simple and easy approach to compare projects and find number of years to recover the initial investment. The most serious weekness of cash payback approach is, it ignore the time value for the money, it also ignore project profitablity and project`s return on investment. As according to cash payback approach, it consider projects with short payback time as profitable and thus ignore useful life of alternative projects.
Answer:
a. Yes. It is a probability density function because \sum f(x) =1
. b. probability MCC will obtain more than 30 new clients=P(40)+P(50)+P(60)= 0.20+0.35+0.20=0.75
c. probability MCC will obtain fewer than 20 new clients= P(10)= 0.05
d.
x f(x) x*f(x) x*x*f(x)
10 0.05 0.5 5
20 0.1 2 40
30 0.1 3 90
40 0.2 8 320
50 0.35 17.5 875
60 0.2 12 720
1 43 2050
expected value = \sum xf(x) = 43
Variance = 2050-43^2= 201
Explanation:
Answer:
Amount received = 217,043.56 (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Monthly deposit = $400
Interest rate = 3.2% / 12 = 0.002667 per month
Number of year = 63 year - 35 year = 28 year
Number of period = 28 × 12 month = 336 month
Computation:
![Amount \ received = PMT[\frac{(1+r)^n-1}{r} ]\\\\Amount \ received = 400[\frac{(1+0.002667)^{336}-1}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[\frac{(1.002667)^{336}-1}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[\frac{2.44713794-1}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[\frac{1.44713794}{0.002667} ]\\\\Amount \ received =400[542.608901]\\\\Amount \ received =217,043.56\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Amount%20%5C%20received%20%3D%20PMT%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Br%29%5En-1%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D%20400%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2B0.002667%29%5E%7B336%7D-1%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281.002667%29%5E%7B336%7D-1%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.44713794-1%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B%5Cfrac%7B1.44713794%7D%7B0.002667%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D400%5B542.608901%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CAmount%20%5C%20received%20%3D217%2C043.56%5C%5C%5C%5C)
Amount received = 217,043.56 (Approx)
Answer: The invisible hand
Explanation: Invisible hand can be defined as those unobservable market forces which helps the forces of demand and supply to reach to an equilibrium level.
In the given case, Daniel is giving work to local suppliers and jobs to residents as well as producing demand in the market by its products, thus, we can conclude that the given case is an example of invisible hand.
Answer:
$300,000
Explanation:
Although the property dividend was distributed on January 15, year 6. the <u>amount that will be used is the value of the shares as at the declaration date and not the distribution date </u>
Hence, since the aggregate market price of the tell shares held by bain was $300,000. on the declaration date, the entry to record the declaration of the dividend should include a debit to retained earnings (or property dividends declared) of $300,000
