The war broke out between the two
C) increase the money supply
Monetarism sees careful control of the money supply as the key to maintaining a stable economy. The ideas of monetarism were first put forth by economist Milton Friedman, who believed that those in charge of the money supply in a society should focus on maintaining price stability. Having too much cash in circulation stimulates inflation. However, in regard to your particular question, during a recession prices stagnate or decrease and interest rates are forced to drop as well. Monetarists would see an increase in the money supply as a way to turn prices back upward during a recession.
I believe the correct answer should be Human Rights.
All of the aforementioned were designed to help the Allied powers during World War II. Even though the US wanted to stay "neutral" when World War II broke out, they did want to benefit by maintaining economic relationships with these countries.
The Lend-Lease Act is a perfect example. This allowed the US government to lend weapons and other materials to nations like France, Great Britain, and China during World War II. If the goods weapons/materials were destroyed, it was on the country using them to replace it.
The Cash and Carry policy was another example of the US government helping the Allied powers. This policy stated that countries may buy materials from the US, as long as they pay in cash and provide transportation for the materials at their own risk.
Both of these show that even though the US was not technically in the war yet, they heavily favored the Allied powers.
No as the quality of a good or service is sometimes influenced by the price and therefore cheaper items/services may be of lower quality. they could be faulty and break quickly and therefore you will end up wasting money in the long run as you will have to replace the item whereas it would have been cheaper to just invest in a better quality more expensive good or service in the first place. hope that helps!
