Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Jeff has -15$ his gf faith gives him 7.
1)Rewrite the table:
70, 49, 34.3, 24.01, 11.807 {The original size of the wound =70}
2) write the quotient of each number by the number before & notice the value:
49/70= 0.7
34.3/49 = 0.7
24.01/34.3 =0.7
16.0807/24.01 = 0.67 ≈0.7
You notice this is a geometric progression with r 0.7
The last term in a GP =ar^⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾
3) Domain and Range of this function:
Last term = a₁.rⁿ⁻¹. let last term be y==> f(n) = y =70(0.7)ⁿ⁻¹
or f(n) = y = 70(0.7)ⁿ / 0.7==> f(n) = [(0.7)ⁿ ]/ 100.
This is a decreasing exponential function where the coefficient
raised to n is < 1.
The domain is for all n>= 0.
When n→∞, f(n)→0; For n=0==>f(n) =70. So the range of f(n) is:<=70
Answer:
-21
Step-by-step explanation:
1-2+4-8+16-32
=-21
Step-by-step explanation:
Let h be the number of hours.
Total Cost = Fixed Costs + Variable Cost
= Initial Fee + Hourly Charge
= 75 + 9h
Given,
Since the car cannot be rent part of an hour, the highest possible whole number is 19 hours.
