1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol13
2 years ago
7

Triangle ABC is ransformed to obtain angle ABC

Mathematics
1 answer:
salantis [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:How do you rotate 180 degrees about the origin?

Rotation by 180° about the origin:

The rule for a rotation by 180° about the origin is (x,y)→(−x,−y) .

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Please help me. This is so confusing.
MrMuchimi
<span>
The vertices of a polygon are given as follows: P(-2,4), Q(4,2), R(4,0); S(-12,0); k = 0.5 Find the coordinates of the vertex P' of the image after a dilation having the given scale factor. Type your answers as a coordinate pair in this format: (x,y)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please Help. Will give Brainliest.
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

translation.........

4 0
3 years ago
HELP ME NOW PLEASE................
Akimi4 [234]
The amount of income tax in dollars and cents is $3,895.38
6 0
3 years ago
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n &gt; 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
3(b+10)−7= what is the answer<br>b=1.5
Rudik [331]

ANSWER: the answer is 27.5 for this question

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can anybody help me plz
    10·1 answer
  • Does the median of a dataset have to be the value of the data set? Explain
    10·2 answers
  • $5.97 / 2 <br><br>please show your work! I'll give brainliest to whoever shows work.
    11·2 answers
  • Please Answer I don't get it​
    12·1 answer
  • 6/100 equals what as a decimal?
    9·2 answers
  • BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to 4(5r+9)?
    5·1 answer
  • Which expressions are equivalent to (d^1/8) ^5
    8·1 answer
  • Identify whether each of the following statements is true or false.
    5·1 answer
  • (–2) + (–20) step by step
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!