Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Prevent the incalculable loss of life it would take to invade mainland japan.
Answer:
what kind of tools and weapons they used
Explanation:
Teddy Roosevelt was also known as the trust buster. He helped to stop the monopolies and the robber barons.
Inductive reasoning involved proceeding from the particular to the general.
The correct answer between all the choices given is the first choice. I am
hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help
you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.