1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tcecarenko [31]
2 years ago
13

Select all the correct answers.

History
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]2 years ago
5 0

As a result of the media being involved, the Civil Rights movement was affected as follows:

  • It caused more people to join the movement by alerting African Americans of civil rights campaigns taking place around the country.
  • It applied pressure on political leaders to support policies designed to combat discrimination.
  • It increased public support for protesters by showing attacks on Black people on television.

<h3>Media Influence on Civil Rights Movement </h3>

As a result of television and news scenes showing Black people being attacked when they exercised their right to protest, many joined the cause to support them. These media outlets also showed the different campaigns happening around the country which allowed people to show up for them.

Political leaders therefore came under heavy pressure to combat discrimination based on what the people saw and the protests that ensued.

In conclusion, the media was very important to the civil rights movement.

Find out more on the Civil Rights Movement at brainly.com/question/131269.

You might be interested in
Which was NOT a cause of the Civil war?
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

2 things one is this a joke question and 2 its D

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Who was king after Charles I was beheaded?
Iteru [2.4K]
James 2 of England and Ireland
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
klio [65]

Answer:

Explanation:

I think itś B

3 0
3 years ago
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable? Why or why not?
Tcecarenko [31]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?

No, really not.

The reason why because his account had created many controversies.

Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.

So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Jumanos adapt when their crops failed?
jarptica [38.1K]
They ate cacti and hunted for animals
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • There are, in all districts of this great city, many temples or houses for their idols. They are all very beautiful buildings .
    8·1 answer
  • Mark the statement if it describes one of the major steps in Napoleon's climb to power.
    9·2 answers
  • What what might have been one advantage of walking completely upright
    15·2 answers
  • When alcohol damages your
    5·1 answer
  • Which event best complete the table
    9·1 answer
  • For years, China had enjoyed a favorable balance of ___ trade with foreign nations. But the British trade of with China disrupte
    9·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS
    5·1 answer
  • What was the impact of WWll on Americans?
    13·2 answers
  • The Document known as the US Constitution is important because?
    11·1 answer
  • PLSS
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!