In the speech, Reagan feels that communists are terrorists, he says that the Sandinista government was supported by Cuba and also called the Contras the freedom fighters.
<h3>What is an
Evil Empire?</h3>
The "Evil Empire" describes the speech by Former U.S. President Ronald Reagan to the National Association of Evangelicals on March 8, 1983 during the Cold war.
In the Evil Empire speech delivered by the Former President:
- Reagan feels that communists are terrorists.
- The speech says that the Sandinista government was supported by Cuba.
- Reagan calls the Contras the freedom fighters.
Read more about Evil Empire
<em>brainly.com/question/12955745</em>
Answer:
Correct answer is D, "It helped diffuse African American culture across the United States."
The answer for this one would Be A because
Aqueducts transport water, they are like the things that supply water to faucets and the sewers
hmm
a. enhanced understanding of human ailments and injuries
not reallyh, that just give water,not wisdom or anything, and injuries are
like stabs, so water doesn't help with understanding stabs
b. improved public sanitation and access to fresh water
duh, this is true
c. sped up transportation across the empire
unless people were small enough to travel in these aqueducts, they couldn't travel using these, also it wouldn't be clean to polute the water with people, the answer for this option would be roads
d. made it easier for Roman officials to rule the provinces
what, they shut the water off or something? send letters down the channel?
the right answer is b
Both readings communicate the fact that slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious context.
Explanation:
Both the readings reflect the fact that slavery is and criminal in nature and its a sinful act to slave an individual ,the reading also indicate that they don t support such practice. Both the readings shows individuals dealing with the hardship of slavery and both the reading also display their protest against the Fugitive Slave Act.
Thus we can summarize that
Both readings communicate the fact that slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious context.
