Explanation:Several thousand terrestrial protected areas (PAs) lie on international boundaries. Because international boundaries can be focal points for trade, illegal activity and development, such PAs can be vulnerable to a range of anthropogenic threats. There is an increasing trend towards the erection of international boundary infrastructure (including fences, barriers and ditches) in many parts of the world, which may reduce the risk of these anthropogenic threats to some PAs. However this may restrict home range and access to resources for some native species. We sought to understand the impacts of these two different types of threat by using camera traps to measure the activity level of humans, native and invasive mammals in four US PAs on the Mexican international boundary. Comparisons were made between treatment areas with barriers and those without. Results showed that puma and coati were more likely to appear in treatment areas without barriers, whereas humans were not observed more frequently in one treatment area over another. The suggestion is that the intermittent fencing present in this part of the world does affect some native species, but does not necessarily restrict the movement of humans (including illegal migrants), who may negatively impact native species.
Africa is right in the middle, and has a large population of Sunni Islam religion. You can see in the Northern part of Africa, that Islam dominates it.
As erosion removes the tops of mountains, the crust will rise upwards. This is an example of isostatic adjustment. This movement of of land once burdened by ice-age glacier,is also known as the Mattress Effect. Erosion, deposition, water loading, desiccation, ice accumulation, and deglaciation can be the reason for this movement.
