Can distinguish facts from opinions
We can actually deduce here that the journal entries for the hypothetical scenarios is seen below:
Journal 1: Few days after the fall of society
- The collapse was as a result of the fall of a big planet to planet earth.
- Then some people were reported to have gone missing all of a sudden.
- Our group survived because we were locked up in underground house as a result of quarantine activities.
Journal 2: Few months after the fall of society.
- There seems to be scarcity of food and we are becoming hungry.
- Markets are shut down because the government placed curfew.
- The reservoirs and provisions made for quarantine is still sustaining us.
Journal 3: Few years after the fall of society.
- We have been able to survive because we have finished our quarantining and out of the underground house.
- We are engaged in hunting activities and a nomadic life.
- The quality of life hasn't improved. We are still struggling to adapt to the new normal.
<h3>What is journal entry?</h3>
Journal entry refers to the act of keepings records of certain events and transactions that take place either economically or non-economically. Journal entry is usually seen in business and commerce. But people still make a record of what happens in their day to day activities.
We see that the above actually shows the three journal entries here about the events that transpired after the fall of society.
Learn more about journal entry on brainly.com/question/28390337
#SPJ1
Answer:
was having/had
Explanation:
it depends on the context outside of it to. For example if you were telling a story and that was a detail it would be "was having" but any other context would be "had"
The argument that is most likely to have influenced the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school is A. The Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the fundamental rights of a person that is protected by law to make his own choices.
Hence, we can see that based on the original decision by the lower courts, they said the school was right to suspend the students, but the main argument that overturned this decision is that fact that the Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Misogyny is the hatred or discrimination against women, so your answer should be two words that have that relationship.
You know that A is not correct because divest means to take away possessions, and that isn't hatred against property.
You know that B is not correct because pathological means relating to disease, not hatred to disease.
Finally, you know that C can't be the right answer because progeny means descendants, not hatred of children.
Misogamy is the hatred of marriage, so D is your answer.
