Answer:
Thank yo for asking this...I was waiting for someone to ask me this.
EXPLANATION: This article examines the extent to which state officials are subject to prosecution in foreign domestic courts for international crimes. We consider the different types of immunity that international law accords to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that the official has committed an international crime. We argue that personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) continues to apply even where prosecution is sought for international crimes
"Concealment" can be an antonym for "Exposition"
Answer:
Correct answer is C) African tribes exchanged captive Africans with European slave traders, who transported them to the Americas under inhumane conditions.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as in general not so many Indians crossed Atlantic Ocean in general, and were not part of the Atlantic slave trade.
B is not correct as Africans were not brought there to built their settlement, but to work as slaves.
C is correct as this is the best definition of slave trade. Slaves were sold in West Africa and sent to the New World, where they would work, mostly on plantation, and were treated as they were not human.
D is not correct as this was not the case, and was not included in this process.
Like 20k to 300k I just took the class
Rousseau argued against inequality with the classes, but on the other hand, Voltaire argued for freedom of speech and religion.
