1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
6

Which statement about the U.S constitution is true?

History
2 answers:
Sliva [168]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. It was the longest-lived written okay for representative government in history

Explanation:

The US Constitution is one of the longest-lasting Constitutions in the World which created a new form of government - Federalism - that has influenced countries all around the world.

The US Constitution was constructed so the process of Amendment was very difficult but not impossible, this is a key factor because the Framers did not want the main points of the Constitution to be changed, they wanted the Constitution to have “a soul” that would not be changed. This is also a key to a long-lasting Constitution.

Novay_Z [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

d I think but like I dont really know, sorry xo

You might be interested in
People who join a polítical party generally do so because ​
Komok [63]

Answer:

of there opinion

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the United States support France in Vietnam?
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
The united states needed French support in western Europe
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many justices must agree to an opinion for the Supreme Court to issue a decision?
tia_tia [17]
Four of the nine justices must agree.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
What are the the major political parties in great britian
Veronika [31]

the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Among the first settlers of the Oregon country, after trappers, were the _____. (1 point)
    13·1 answer
  • After fighting a war to leave a strong government (Britain), why did the Founding Fathers want to create a strong government?
    15·1 answer
  • A CONQUISTADOR IS A SPANISH EXPLORER. A. True B. False
    13·2 answers
  • Which Native America tribe in Florida began attacking settlers both in Florida and in
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these organizations was established to support Jewish-American soldiers fighting in World War I?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes President Lyndon Johnson?
    10·1 answer
  • What european country was france fighting against french and the Indian war
    10·1 answer
  • How far in kilometers will honoulu move in 2000 years
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think the Mughal Empire flourished under Akbar<br> but fell apart after Aurangzeb?
    13·1 answer
  • Which events increased tensions between the Japan and the United States in the late 1930s? Select three options.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!