The United States thought that it had solved its problems after assuming independence, but the tension between the northern and southern states only grew due to differences in relation to slavery. The northern and southern states were completely different, and had very different views on almost everything. Although the act of commitment was implemented, this did not solve the problems, as the states were still very independent and created ways to circumvent these rules. All this tension led to the Civil War.
I believe it was around 3500 BC.
Answer:
The following explains the outcome and significance of the District of Columbia v. Heller case,
The Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller, that the Second Amendment allows law-abiding U.S. citizens to own and carry handguns in the district.
Explanation: In the 2008 landmark Supreme Court Case The District of Columbia v. Heller, it was found that the Second Amendment allows LAW ABIDING citizens to own and carry handguns in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC). This case found the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. The Act of 1975 called for handguns used for home and self defense to be unloaded, disassembled, and/or locked.
If one individual behaves in a socially inappropriate manner, he or she is considered deviant, but if several individuals behave this way, it is referred to as a collective action. The problem that is made would be called a collective action problem wherein a group of people tries to behave in a discouraging manner in order to achieve a common goal. But the term collective action id not only limited to inappropriate behaviors. It would be a group activity where they aim to achieve the same goals. Examples are joining social protests, participating in national defense, advocating for the preservation of the environment and strikes.<span />
