Answer:
Legal.
Explanation:
The term crime in the question above is defined in typical legal terms.
The term crime can be defined as an illegal action that violates the law of the society. In simple terms or typical social language, it can be said as a performance of an act that is unlawful and punishable according to the law.
<u>But in legal terms, it is an act performed with the intention of violating the law or code, as defined above in the question</u>.
So, the correct answer is it is a typical legal definition of crime.
Answer:the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Monopoly describes a market situation in which only one company controls the supply of a certain goods or service. There is no competition so the company can charge whatever price it wants. Because of that, government usually has rules and regulations for a monopoly.
Answer:
The Stonewall riots (also referred to as the Stonewall uprising or the Stonewall rebellion) were a series of spontaneous, violent demonstrations by members of the gay (LGBT) community against a police raid that began in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the Stonewall Inn in the Greenwich Village neighborhood
Explanation:
lot has changed for LGBTQ Americans in the 50 years since June 28, 1969, when an uprising in response to a police raid at the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Manhattan’s West Village neighborhood, kicked off a new chapter of grassroots activism. The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down state bans on same-sex marriage; the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy has come and gone; one of the candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination is gay.
But one thing that has changed surprisingly little is the narrative about what exactly happened that night. In half a century, we haven’t gained any new major information about how Stonewall started, and even experts and eyewitnesses remain unsure how exactly things turned violent.
“We have, since 1969, been trading the same few tales about the riots from the same few accounts — trading them for so long that they have transmogrified into simplistic myth,”
Answer:
El budismo había asestado un duro golpe a la fe brahmínica. Amenazado con la extinción, el hinduismo comenzó a reorganizarse. Ahora se intentó abandonar el complejo sistema de ritos y rituales y hacer que el hinduismo fuera simple y atractivo. Los hindúes incluso llegaron a aceptar al Buda como una encarnación hindú y aceptaron el principio de la no violencia. Esto ayudó a revivir el hinduismo y lo hizo popular nuevamente. Esto le quitó la fragancia a la flor del budismo. El declive del budismo se volvió inevitable.
Explanation:
THIS IS IN ENGLISH
Buddhism had dealt a heavy blow to Brahminical faith. Threatened with extinction, Hinduism started to re-organize itself. Attempts were now made to give up the complex system of rites and rituals and make Hinduism simple and attractive. The Hindus even came to accept the Buddha as a Hindu incarnation and accepted the principle of non-violence. This helped revive Hinduism and made it popular again. This took away the fragrance out of the flower of Buddhism. The decline of Buddhism became inevitable.
