Yes because they didn't fight people or hurt in that matter????? idk who the intolerables even are<span />
The correct answer is: "it violates the right to privacy".
The USA PATRIOT Act was enacted in 2001 as a reponse to the September 11 attacks and signed by President George Bush. The name of this act is actually an acronym which stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001"
The Patriot Act in its Tittle II confers increased powers to surveillance agencies and bodies dependent of the federal government. Its promoters argued it was a necessary measure to suceed on the war against terrorism. On the other hand, its detractors claimed that these provisions went against individual freedoms and basic civic rights.
Answer:
the united states treasury
Explanation:
treasurys usually have to do with money so thats why i picked it
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, addresses the obligations that states inside the United States need to regard "the general population acts, records, and legal procedures of each other state."
According to the Supreme Court, there is a contrast between the credit owed to laws (for example authoritative measures and customary law) when contrasted with the credit owed to judgments.
Judgments are commonly qualified for more prominent appreciation than laws, in other states. At present, it is broadly concurred that this Clause of the Constitution has little effect on a court's decision of law decision, in spite of the fact that this Clause of the Constitution was once translated differently.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
France hadn't begun its revolution yet
