1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nevsk [136]
2 years ago
8

What could possibly happen if a president were unable to deploy troops without first getting

History
1 answer:
professor190 [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

could be indited and have reason for impeachment

Explanation:

that power is given through two branches of government. and if it is for unlawful reason it is considered treason

You might be interested in
Which of the following headlines would have most likely appeared in a newspaper in 1861?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

in 1861

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What's the answer based on the info you get
Mila [183]
Your best answer would be c
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HURRY PLEASE!!!
harkovskaia [24]

Answer: True

Explation , this is true. This is named as a speech that incites (makes people commit) imminent lawless action - that is, speech that incites violence or breaking the law. Another exceptions to the rule of free speech are obscenity,- which is a quite controversial exception

4 0
3 years ago
What happened to the ottoman empire after ww1?
solniwko [45]
The Ottoman Empire fought alongside the Central Powers in World War 1, namely Germany and the Austria-Hungarian Empire. It had already been in a period of decline leading up to the war, and its defeat to the Allied Powers was essentially what led to its dissolution.

Following the defeat of the Central Powers and the occupation of Constantinople (Istanbul in present-day Turkey) that followed, the Ottoman Empire was partitioned (divided up) and temporarily administered by the victories Allied Powers. This meant the abolition of the Sultanate and the end of the Ottoman Empire.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is the argument of missile defense in the nation of Cuba a non-starter?
k0ka [10]
The argument of missile defense in the nation of Cuba is a non-starter because the USA will never willingly allow a nation that is so close to its territory, and is an ally of its arch enemy, Russia, to have such a defensive system installed, because it will also mean that Russia may use Cuba as its military base and threaten the USA territory at any moment, from close proximity, and also they will have a protection by any attack as a response.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did ligers in world war 1 work for low pay
    11·1 answer
  • I need a sentence that includes papyrus and pyramid.
    9·2 answers
  • Identify and explain the Counter-Reformation.<br> WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Large numbers of skilled workers left Iran in the early 21st century, primarily because __________.
    5·2 answers
  • From about 753 to 509 B.C., Rome was ruled by the _____. A.Greeks B.Etruscans C.Romuluses D.Carthaginians E.Carthaginians
    8·2 answers
  • How did their previous status as colonies of European powers have an effect on the development of many less developed countries?
    5·1 answer
  • What American victory helped build morale during the harsh winter of 1776?
    14·1 answer
  • Separation of church and state was an important issue during the Reformation and continues to be today. What arguments might you
    9·1 answer
  • The last Europeans to arrive in the Good Coast was​
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways did the wars between france and britain cause problems for the untied states?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!