All categories

3 years ago

50 POINTS!! PLEASEE HELPP! Don’t just put any random answer, I will report you, and just get my points back.

English

2 answers:

kramer3 years ago

8 0

A. O "Nay, let them only see us,

while / We wear the mask." O

this is answer but not sure

MAXImum [283]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

I think it's C because it tells how it hides and it tells the debt

I tried my best so i'm sorry if it's wrong

You might be interested in

What is the topic of the poem “night walk”? What Are the Speaker’s Reflections on the Topic?

AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

The theme of the poem is death and the inevitability of it. The author is trying to make themselves one with nature and its ugly surroundings that will over power him.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Answer ASAP pleaseeee How do cultures practices enrich their culture????

Mariana [72]

It teaches more about culture in general. You would get "used" to your culture. Let's say your Muslim and you don't pray often, once you do you'll be used to it and pass it on to your children and enrich your culture. Culture could mean anything from clothes to decor. Passing it down to future generations would enrich it. Hope this helps (;❤️

5 0

3 years ago

Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.

konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0

3 years ago

Sanjay is part of a group text with several of his friends. One of them had an unpleasant encounter with a student in their clas

umka2103 [35]

Answer: D

Explanation: he feels as if he doesn’t conform or act a certain way they will not like him.

7 0

3 years ago

Exercises of english solve it pls

Elden [556K]

Answer:

1. This is the biggest building in the world.

2. This is the most comfortable chair here.

3. He bought the most expensive flowers in the shop.

4. I think she's the best singer of the group.

5. He's the most careful driver of the company.

6. Who's the oldest student in the class?

7. It's the worst film I've ever seen.

8. She's the most intelligent of all the students.

Explanation:

The superlative form is when three or more things are compared. This form of adjective describes the lowest or the highest form of the group. It is identified by the use of the suffix '-est' or the addition of the word "most" before the adjective. In some cases, the adjectives change to the simple V3 form.

1. This is the biggest building in the world.

2. This is the most comfortable chair here.

3. He bought the most expensive flowers in the shop.

4. I think she's the best singer of the group.

5. He's the most careful driver of the company.

6. Who's the oldest student in the class?

7. It's the worst film I've ever seen.

8. She's the most intelligent of all the students.

4 0

3 years ago