Answer: Cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
In social psychology, cognitive dissonance can be defined as the conflict or disharmony between personal beliefs that a person has and the new information they receive. That is a person who has a concept about something and then receives different information about what he knew may have an internal conflict. An example of cognitive dissonance is the case of Sarah. Sarah knows that stealing is not right and after she does it begins to have a less hard concept about what it is to steal. Sarah Sarah's beliefs are clashing with her behaviors.
When cognitive dissonance is present, the person looks for ways to set aside one of the two ideas to reduce mental conflict. In Sarah's case, she decided to have a less harsh opinion about stealing, where she may have sought causes to justify the theft and thus feel less guilt.
When people commit actions that go against their principles and beliefs, they tend to change their perception after the act and look for reasons to not feel the full weight of having done something that they did not consider appropriate in the first place.
Cognitive dissonance is something that we have experienced at some point in our lives and in some cases, there is no reason to feel bad. People have a belief system that was formed based on the behaviors they saw and developed and from there they developed ideas about what they consider right or wrong. With the passage of time and the opportunity to live various experiences, the person may feel a shock and see how their perceptions change.
This type of ethical relativism holds that ethical judgments are the result of the moral outlook and attitudes of particular persons <u>Individual ethical relativism</u>
The idea that morality is based on cultural standards is known as ethical relativism. In other words, the moral standards of the culture in which a behavior is engaged determine whether it is right or bad. The same behavior could be morally acceptable in one community but unacceptable in another.
There are no universal moral laws that can be applied to all individuals at all times, according to the ethical relativist. The only moral benchmarks a community may use to evaluate its actions are its own. There cannot be a universal framework for resolving moral disagreements if ethical relativism is true.
To know more about ethical relativism
brainly.com/question/14546755
#SPJ4
Answer:
B). It is likely that student opinions in one particular high school do not accurately represent the opinions of all high school students.
C). Students that take the time to complete the survey and mail it in probably feel strongly about hot lunches.
Explanation:
As per the given description of the study, the method could be considered bias as <u>the inclination towards collecting data from the nearest high school may influence the accuracy and efficacy of the results or judgment. The student taking time would prevent a natural study as there are chances of the student receiving false or untruth information</u>. Thus, it is always recommended that the sample(for survey or test) a must be selected randomly(a not selectively) and the conduct on-the-spot survey for collecting true data in order to achieve an objective, generalized, and substantial results/deductions. Thus, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
How did they know who was Jewish?
■ How did Jews fight back?
■ Who were the Nazis?
■ Why did they target Jews?
Explanation:
