In which subfield of psychology did most women earn their ph.ds in 1974, 1990, and 2005?

1 answer:

5 0

<span>Women and men differ in their career choices both across and within fields, and psychology is no exception. Although subfield segregation has been reduced over the years, subfield differences persist (see Table 1). For example, in 2002, 82.7% of PhDs in developmental psychology were awarded to women, while only 56.2.% of PhDs in experimental psychology were awarded to women. (We excluded comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality because of the small number of graduates: 7, 13, 8, and 23, respectively.) However, of new PhDs awarded in psychology in 2002, women earned more than 50% across all subfields (again, excluding comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality). Unfortunately, the increasing number and proportions of psychologists who are women have not translated into equal professional participation across various subfields and leadership positions within psychology.</span>

You might be interested in

As ocean depth increases, _____.

pogonyaev

As ocean depth increases, so does density of the water. Salinity increases, while temperature decreases.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and build

Ilya [14]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

"Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and building codes, state license regulations, and federal environmental statutes. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must

a. persuade three-fourths of the jurors to agree on a guilty verdict. b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict. c. convince the court it is more likely than not that the charges are true d. prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rosa committed every essential element of an offense."

Answer:

b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict.

Explanation:

When convicting someone for the practice of a criminal offense, the judge imposes the penal sanction that the law provides: penalties of imprisonment, detention, simple imprisonment, restrictive rights and a fine. This conviction has other effects, both criminal and extra-penal. However, for a conviction to be carried out, the judge must reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty. In order to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to show evidence that proves that the defendant is acting in disagreement with the law and therefore should be punished.

In the case shown in the question, for Rosa to receive a sentence, the charge imposed on her must show evidence as reasonably allowing a guilty verdict.

7 0

3 years ago

Marty’s persuasive speech was about gun control and school violence. He made the statement, "We either get rid of the guns in ou

Oliga [24]

Answer:

either-or fallacy

Explanation:

In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.

Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.

Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.

3 0

3 years ago

NAFTA is a trade organization that was established by the countries of

igor_vitrenko [27]

North America. NAFTA stands for north american federal trade agreement.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Advise a friend who responds to conflict by using the strategies below on why

tangare [24]

It’s A because trust

8 0

3 years ago