I think the answer is Blind Spot.
I hope this helps :)
50% or 0.5 is the probability that the offspring will have a cleft chin.
Explanation:
Data given:
Cleft chin = dominant, genotype CC
one parent, heterozygous so genotype, Cc
other parent = no cleft chin, genotype is cc (recessive)
probability of child with cleft chin =?
The cross between the given genotype will be shown in punnet square:
C c
c Cc cc
c Cc cc
The results obtained from the cross shows that 50% chances of the progeny having cleft chin.
The phenotype ratio: cleft chin: no cleft chin
1:1
the genotype ratio of the progeny
heterozygous dominant : recessive homozygous
1:1
Answer:
In this modern age of science. Which of the following shows the most promise in production crops with a higher yield
A genetic engineering of crops plants
Answer: B, Desert.
Explanation:
Desert biomes are the driest of all biomes, meaning that it has the least amount of precipitation.
Answer:
See the answer below
Explanation:
<em>The problem with grouping organisms together taxonomically based on their physical traits is that organisms that not genetically or evolutionally similar would be grouped together. Grouping would be based entirely on superficial similarities instead of combining different features such as genetics, nutrition, the complexity of bodies, etc.</em>
Based on physical traits, for example, all flying organisms will be grouped together. Birds, flying insects, bats, etc. would be grouped together, whereas, they are quite different from one another when it comes to the complexity of bodies and other features. Even though some insects have wings and can fly like birds, insects have exoskeletons and birds do not, the body of birds is more complex than that of insects, and evolutionally, birds are more advanced than insects.
Hence, grouping organisms based on their physical traits only would be too superficial and not reflect the true relationships between organisms.
