Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
In United states:
Can produce 25 tons of steel or 250 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 250 ÷ 25
= 10 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 25 ÷ 250
= 0.1 tons of steel
In Japan:
Can produce 30 tons of steel or 275 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 275 ÷ 30
= 9.17 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 30 ÷ 275
= 0.11
Therefore,
United States has a comparative advantage in producing automobiles because the opportunity cost of producing automobiles is lower than the Japan.
Japan has a comparative advantage in producing steel because the opportunity cost of producing steel is lower than the United states.
B.) moral I think. Hope this helps
I think the answer is a but I am not for sure
Answer:
Before starting her import business, Elena should try to gather relevant information from companies that import goods, and if possible information about companies that import African goods.
Explanation:
Elena might be right about American consumers liking African products, but if importing those goods is too difficult, or is subject to several trade barriers, or some other issues, then Elena might have to reconsider her idea. Sometimes no matter how good a business idea is, if it is impractical to carry out, then t is useless.
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
In 2017, Lynx earned an accounting profit of $3 million.
Lynx's production facilities might have also been used to produce components for mobile phones, which would have generated $2 million in revenues and saved the company $500,000 in production costs.
The accounting profit involves only explicit costs. While economic profit includes both explicit as well as implicit cost.
Here, the implicit cost is the opportunity cost of producing toys components. Lynx could have earned greater profit if it produced components for mobile phone and also could have saved cost of production.
Economic profit
= accounting profit - implicit cost
= $3 million - ($2 million + $500,000)
= $3 million - $2.5 million
= $500,000
So, Lynx had an economic profit of $500,000.
