Answer:
If Firm 2 does not advertise, Firm 1 should advertise
If Firm 2 advertises, then Firm 1 should also advertise
Firm 1 dominant strategy is to advertise
Firm 2 dominant strategy is to advertise
1. A. Nash equilibrium is for both Firms to advertise.
Explanation:
Nash equilibrium is a state where interactions by different firms in a matrix is involved. No firm can gain by a unilateral change of strategy if other firm does not changes its strategy. It is a situation where there is optimal when there is no deviation from the initial strategy. Here firm 1 can by advertise and Firm 2 can also optimize by advertising.
Answer: $1,177
Explanation:
First we calculate the Monthly service fee by the formula,
Monthly servicing fee = Monthly servicing fee rate * Outstanding loan balance,
The service fee is 35 basis points which translates to 0.35 % and is an annual figure so we will adjust it to a monthly one,
= (0.35%/12) * $250,000
= $72.92
To calculate amount that passes through to the mortgage pass we do,
Mortgage pass-through amount = Monthly mortgage payment - Monthly servicing fee
= $1,250 - $72.92
= $1,177.08,
= $1,177
$1,177 is the income that will pass through to the investor in the mortgage pass through each month
Answer:
bank statement 56,300
Checks outstanding (25,390)
Deposit in transit not recorded by bank<u> 13,325 </u>
Adjusted bank statement 44,235
Cash account 42,920
Bank debit memo for service charges (35)
check register error: <u> 1,350 </u>
Adjusted cash account 44,235
Explanation:
The procedure is to adjust for the unknow information and mistake of each party.
The bank is unaware of the check outstanding and deposit in transit
The company thanks to the banbk statement gets information about a mistake in his check register as it was posted for 1,500 when it should be 150.
Answer:
$0 because an agreement to accept different performance in lieu of full payment of liquidated debt is binding.
Explanation:
Since there is an agreement between Amy, a baker, and her brother, she owes him $0.
At first, Amy gets a loan of $3,000 from her brother to pay for her dream home. She agrees to pay him back in one year, and that agreement was binding. During the time to pay back the loan, Amy offers to bake her brother's wedding cake instead of paying back the loan and her brother accepts. This has presented a new agreement that overrules the previous agreement. Now instead of paying back the $3,000, she would bake a wedding cake for him. This implies that the wedding cake is equal to $3,000.
Therefore, she owes him $0.
Answer:
Consider the following calculations
Explanation:
According to this general formula
f1,k = [(1+rk+1)k+1/((1+r1)]1/k -1
f1,1 = [(1+ 4.9%)1+1/((1+4.4%)]1/1 -1 = 5.40%
f1,2 = [(1+ 5.6%)2+1/((1+4.4%)]1/2 -1 = 6.21%
f1,3 = [(1+ 6.4%)3+1/((1+4.4%)]1/3 -1 =7.08%