1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GrogVix [38]
2 years ago
14

How is Japan treated differently than Africa during Imperialism?

History
1 answer:
Nonamiya [84]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Read the following

Explanation:

So Japan had a period of moderniziation (The Meiji Restoration Period) where they developed rapidly and managed to get a military and navy similar to the major powers. However, they weren't seen as equals to the Europeans. Now they weren't colonized because, they did isolate themselves but when they were forced out of isolation, they knew they had to modernize or they'll become like the Qing Dynasty (modern day china) and have imperial powers take advantage of them and there lands. So unlike Africa, Japan actually had a realistic chance of defending themselves from invaders, something that would make invading Japan costly. Not only that, but after 1900 it would be almost impossible to treat the Japanese like they did to Africa, as they rapidly grew a European like military and navy. Also, they were one of the 11 nations that sent troops to Peking in the boxer rebellion, which kind of showed how the Japanese weren't equal to the Qing Dynasty, at least in terms of military and navy as they were shown to be much stronger. Finally in 1904, the Russo-Japanese war begun, and while Russia had the largest army in the world at that time (in terms of troop count) the Japanese managed to invade Manchuria which was partially owned by the Russians at that time. Also, they destroyed the Russian naval fleet, ending the chance of Russia ever being able to invade Japan again (at least until WW2). So after the Russo-Japanese war, Japan was considered a great power, and most likely the next asian hegemony, which they were for a time in WW2.

You might be interested in
What was the overall goal of the Napoleonic Code?
Arisa [49]
The overall goal of the Napoleonic Code is to reform French law in line with the principles of the Revolution. Even before the revolution, there are a lot of policies that the French has been following. The Napoleonic Code <span>was inspired by Bavaria’s Civil legal system, The Codex Maximilianeus Bavaricus Civilis. </span>
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If an adult has to report to court for a traffic case, his or her case would MOST LIKELY be held in
butalik [34]
It would most likely be held in State Court
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Comparing Federalist and Anti-Federalist Positions
OleMash [197]

The interest group that voiced opinions on ratifying the constitution and establishing a more powerful central government was known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

<h3>Who are the Federalists and Anti-Federalists?</h3>

A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and rejecting ratification.

In contrast to the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, the Federalists stood for those who favored the establishment of a more powerful federal government.

Because they believed that state constitutions already protected individual rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed a bill of rights in the Constitution.

In exchange for their approval, the Federalists agreed to include the Bill of Rights.

To ensure that the rights would not be revoked by the new federal government, the Anti-Federalists insisted that a bill of rights be included in the Constitution.

To learn more about Anti-Federalists, visit:

brainly.com/question/28622723

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Explain why the throckmorton plot was a threat to Queen Elizabeth
tatiyna

<u>Answer:</u>

The Throckmorton plot was a threat to Queen Elizabeth because it conspired to overthrow Queen Elizabeth I and bring Queen Mary of Scots to the throne.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • For the fulfillment of the intention of re-establishing Roman Catholicism, it was necessary for the radical English Roman Catholics to take down Queen Elizabeth I and crown Queen Mary of Scots as the queen of England.
  • This conspiracy was revealed after a few suspicious attempts made for the said cause and the main conspirator, Francis Throckmorton was punished for it.
7 0
3 years ago
What makes two people‚ members of the same race
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Equality

Explanation:

What makes two people members of the same race is equality

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The national government, if it wished, could establish a national public
    13·2 answers
  • What is Alexander Hamilton view on the economy
    13·1 answer
  • Many southern states tried to limit the effects of radical reconstruction by
    5·2 answers
  • Someone please help me!
    13·1 answer
  • The main reason the US Senate rejected the treaty of Versallies was because
    15·1 answer
  • What happened to Cuba after the Spanish-American War?
    7·2 answers
  • 3.
    9·2 answers
  • Which region would have been most supportive of war with Mexico to gain territory?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did kennedy and guevara see this revolution differently
    9·1 answer
  • Where did the Russians locate their first settlement in the New World?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!