Answer:
Modest short term deterrent, but will need mass executions to be effective
Explanation:
The question has already been answered but I guess you need an explanation.
In the deterrence theory by Professor Land and his colleagues, they assumes that offenders are rational, I.e. they know the law and the penalties attached to defaulting the law..
They're are three points to take note of in this study;
1. For execution to have a deterrent effect, then it means a huge number of execution must have taken place
2. Most of any deterrent effect of execution of homicide occurs immediately after the execution is made public
3. 5 to 10 homicides would deterred in a year if there are 10 to 20 executions using 0.5 homicides deterred on a monthly basis.
The early history of euthanasia is best described with "<span>-It was practiced in Ancient Greece and Rome, yet became less common with the rise of Christianity.", for example, herbs were used in ancient Greece to fasten death, and this practice was supported by many famous philosophers. </span>
You would have to break a law.
Some examples of that are:
1. Possession of illegal drugs
2. Drinking while driving
3. Domestic violence
Hope this helps!<span />
<u>The answer is "Tolerance for Ambiguity".</u>
Tolerance for ambiguity can be characterized as how much an individual is OK with vulnerability, unusualness, clashing bearings, and various requests. Fundamentally, tolerance for ambiguity is show in a man's capacity to work successfully in a dubious domain. The degree of vagueness may differ significantly and is by and large connected to the hidden reason for vulnerability.
