1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
2 years ago
12

In which areas of the brain would a stroke mimic damage to cranial nerve 2

Biology
1 answer:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]2 years ago
3 0

The occipital lobe is the area of the brain that a stroke would affect to mimic damage to cranial nerve 2.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Cranial nerve 2 is the optic nerve, responsible for visual information.
  • This nerve is directly connected to the occipital lobe.
  • In this case, when a stroke affects the occipital lobe, cranial nerve 2 can be affected and if this happens the optic nerve will have problems.

Optic nerve problems can cause defects in the field of vision, impede central vision, not allow the eyes to focus on a particular element, and have centrocecal or altitudinal problems.

More information:

brainly.com/question/8216106?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
What conclusion can you make regarding how humans affect biodiversity? Is evidence from the graph to support your answer
vodomira [7]

Answer:

Decrease population of staghorn coral and spotlight parrot fish.

Explanation:

Humans greatly affects biodiversity by decreasing the population of most of the organisms due to its activities. Human activities causes pollution in the environment as well as disturbed the habitats of many organisms that leads to  decrease in their population. Humans activities releases carbondioxide gas in large concentration that will leads to the increase of pH of the ocean water which adversely affected the population of many marine animals such as staghorn coral and spotlight parrot fish etc so that's why we can say that human activities adversely affected biodiversity.

4 0
2 years ago
During a period of almost a million years, Australopithecus boisei and Homo habilis lived in the same region of East Africa. If
sesenic [268]

Answer:

It’s hard to assume so much based on the little evidence we have. Maybe some of the fossils we find are different because they were malformed individuals, not because they are a totally different species. 2.This question may be completed independently or as a group exercise. The Australopithecus sedibafinds demonstrate that evolution is mosaic, meaning that species often have a combination of ancestral and new traits. How would this fossil material be interpreted if only the arm bones were found? How would this fossil material be interpreted if only the pelvis were found? Based on this example, what problems do paleoanthropologists face when trying to interpret the fragmentary fossil record? a.A lot of problems can occur when we find only certain body parts and make assumptions on them rather than having more of a collection of parts to build a solid picture. In the case of Au. sedibawe can show how problematic this could be. If we only found the arm we might assume they were brachiators because of how long it is without realizing that their phalanges weren’t curved meaning they probably did very little in the trees. If we found just their pelvis we might assume they were much closer to Homo than they are because we didn’t have the other body parts to show the differences they had from Homo. The problem with a fragmentary fossil record is that it’s extremely difficult to really be sure of anything without having more of the picture. This also shows how important it is to find

fossils of other animals and plants from the same time period to get an idea of the environment that the species lived it. 3.This question may be completed independently or as a group exercise. During a period of almost a million years, Australopithecus boiseiand Homo habilislived in the same region of East Africa. If these species shared a habitat, how did they not outcompete one another? (Hint: Think about their possible ecologies and adaptations.) a.Although Au. boiseiand H. habilislived during the same time, they wouldn’t need to compete because of how different their diets were. They both had a diet that consisted mostly of plants, but the key difference is in H. habilis’stool use. Since H. habilishad more of a capacity to use tools, it increased the possibility of food that they could eat. This increase in diet possibility makes competition for food much less likely. 4.This question may be completed independently or as a group exercise. In this lab we discussed the earliest known stone tools. Do you think this was the first time our extinct relatives used tools? Why might older tools not be preserved in the fossil record? For comparison, describe three tools from your own life (a cell phone, a pencil, a plastic fork, etc.). Do you think these tools will be preserved 2.5 million years from today? a.Although we don’t have the fossil record of earlier tool use it’s very possible that earlier ancestors were using tools. If we assume that they were using tools from the environment, such as stone or wood, the normal weathering processes in the natural environment would likely destroy the tools over time, at least beyond recognition. Another problem is us recognizing what is a tool or not. As in the question, even if a phone survived 2.5 million years without being destroyed by the elements, would future species even recognize what it is? Parts of it might work or not.?

Explanation:

Well During a period of almost a million years, Australopithecus boisei and Homo habilis lived in the same region of East Africa. If these species shared a habitat, how did they not outcompete one another? Be sure to provide a detailed answer that includes information from the fossil record, such as specific physical traits and behaviors in these species.

6 0
3 years ago
Why would a pigeon breeder select the offspring of pigeons with spotted bodies and then breed those offspring?
Scrat [10]

To introduce a new type of species into the environment

Hope I helped  

8 0
3 years ago
A mixture of lipids is applied to a silica gel column, and the column is then washed with increasingly polar solvents. Arrange t
VMariaS [17]

A mixture of lipids is applied to a silica gel column, and the column is then washed with increasingly polar solvents. Arrange the lipids in order of elution by placing the first lipid to elute at the top.

a. triglyceride

b. cholesterol

c. sphingosine

d. phosphatidyl serine

e. sphingomyelin

7 0
2 years ago
Which of these characteristics would be part of fungus​
leonid [27]

i think the answer is D

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can a Mayflies live for 1 day?
    15·2 answers
  • How are photosynthesis and cellular respiration related?
    5·2 answers
  • Speciation is the formation of new species as result of evolution by natural selection. What effect could separation of populati
    14·1 answer
  • How much methane may be locked up in sediments containing gas hydrates ?
    7·1 answer
  • One treatment for high blood pressure is taking diuretics that prevent the kidney collecting ducts from reabsorbing water. How w
    12·2 answers
  • Genetic engineering is the manipulation of genes using cloning and transformation to change the gene structure. Genetic engineer
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think molds are not growing all over everything around you?
    9·1 answer
  • Using site-directed mutagenesis, you have created a mutant form of chymotrypsin that has alanine substituted for the usual serin
    15·1 answer
  • An insect eats a leaf. Explain how the insect depends on the sun for energy.
    12·1 answer
  • What are gametes? Gametes are seeds. Gametes are spores. Gametes are a part of asexual reproduction. Gametes are sex cells, like
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!