He used the profit he made as an investment, and in this way his fortune grew ever bigger and bigger. If ever there was a profit, he would not spend it, but use to expand the current business, or if this way not optimal, to buy new businesses and assets.
<span />
Answer:
A. It is likely that she would win on the claim because she does not seek to use the photographs in a business pursuit.
Explanation:
In fair use act, <em><u>which is the copying of any given copyrighted material done for a limited purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize e.t.c,</u></em> the major aim is to prevent the copying of the materilas for financial gains. Such copying can be done without permission from the copyright owner.
She could likely win based on this argument as a result of her trying to copy only few copies of the pictures from the original pictures without any aim of monetizing her copies.
<em>Since it is going to be done for limited purpose, she is within her right of fair use if she decided to go ahead without the photographer's permisssion.</em>
Hey there yo!!!
So the best and most correct answer is
D.The document required trial by a jury of one's peers.
Hope this helps
P.s. I'd really appreciate brainliest answer from u ;)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Between 8-10 years old, children are able to mentally combine, separate, order, and transform objects and actions. Their ability to apply logic and reason increases, as does their ability to focus attention. They are able to consider multiple perspectives and apply various thought-out strategies. And while they struggle with understanding abstract or hypothetical concepts, children this age can apply mental operations to concrete problems, objects, and events.
Answer:
B..buyers and sellers
Explanation:
I just had this question a year ago about...(:
