Answer:
Dombey and Sons.
Explanation:
The character of James Carker is from the novel "Dombey and Sons" by Charles Dickens. In the story, he plays a devious and manipulative manager in Mr. Dombey's business.
Mr. James Carker is the head clerk and manager in Mr. Dombey's shipping company. He is a devious and manipulative man who thinks only for himself. His greed brought upon the ruin of Mr. Dombey' business and personal life. He has two siblings, an elder brother John and a sister Harriet. Due to his trusted position in the business, he knew a lot of details about Mr. Dombey's life, professionally and personally. His hatred for his boss made him want to humiliate him. So, carrying on an affair with Edith, Mr. Dombey's wife, he had decided on an elopement. But Edith only wanted it t be an affair and not a full elopement. This made him scared of Mr. Dombey if he ever finds out. So, during his attempts to flee, he was confronted by Mr. Dombey. On his rush to get away, he fell on the train tracks and was killed.
How to Read Negative Body Language
Being aware of negative body language in others can allow you to pick up on unspoken issues or bad feelings. So, in this section, we'll highlight some negative nonverbal signals that you should look out for.
Positive body language can help you make a positive impression in interview situations. Here are some examples of positive (good) and negative (bad) body language.
Answer:
C) keeping an open mind.
Explanation:
Ricardo showed a great example of how to be open-minded about work. As seen in the text above, Ricardo was replaced in the project he was managing because he was having difficulties and his presence did not allow the project to move forward. Ricardo was aware that a new manager would be the best for the project to progress and so he accepted the replacement and showed the points where he had made mistakes, so that the new manager could resolve them. This shows how Ricardo is an open-minded person, willing to act according to what is best for his projects.
Answer:
Yes and no
Explanation: The KKK has been the centre of white supremacy for many years, thus making it extremely unpopular for people around the world, in particularly the black ethnic minorities in the United States. People could also argue that they have made it to exercise their right and their human rights to freedom of speech. But that makes the human wonder, are they doing it in the right way? So there can be a divide in what people think about the KKK. If a person thinks that they have the right to do what they did because it is freedom of speech, someone might say back that they have done this in a completely wrong way and have neglected and have "bent the rules" on what the KKK can and cannot do in terms of what people again have their opinions on this specific topic. In my opinion, i think that the KKK shouldn't really have the right to exist in the US as they have caused eruptions of violence over the past few decades causing a cascade of disruption and controversy. Though they are extremely involved in the whole topic of white supremacy, i think the KKK lures in vulnerable people, brainwashing them into thinking that a person with a different colour skin to them is inferior to them, also going against their Christian values. Take for example Daryl Davis, a black man who managed to get multiple people to leave the KKK, not by using violence and threatening them, but by understanding them, having talks with them and eventually showing them the true side of black people, caring compassionate people.
Many thanks for asking this,
Faizan, 13
Well I know that the meaning of et tu brute means “even you Brutus?” That was Julius Caesar’s last words when he got stabbed