Answer:
The ancient China took about 40 years to stabilize under the Qing Dynasty, following the fall of the Ming Dynasty. The Qing Dynasty used the following methods in expanding its territories;
Military expansions and campaigns.
Chinese immigrations into surrounding empires.
Demanding Chinese silk in trade between China, Europe and Middle east.
The Songhay King used indigenous animist religion to strike fear into his enemies.
To generate revenue, the Aztec rulers improvised an economical strategy of extracting resources from conquered lands and peoples. Some city states were merged into few provinces-rendering raw materials and manufactured goods readily available through local production and trade.
To stabilize and legitimize their rule, Aztec rulers directed for a direct interference with the rulership of subject city states. These conquered city states became more tightly controlled by their overlords. The incorporation of these subjects into the empire was often facilitated by removing the vanquished city state rulers and replacing them with a trusted imperial relative, sometimes as interim governors.
Another way that the Aztec empire solidified its rule was through the indirect or hegemonic rule. In this case, the rulers of the conquered city states were left in power so long as they agreed to pay semi-tribute to the Alliance with the Aztec empire, as well as supply military forces when needed by the Aztec empire. In return, the Aztec imperial power offered protection and political stability as well as facilitating an integrated economic network.
Answer:
Environmental resistance factors are all the things that keep a population of organisms from endlessly increasing.
They lower the chances for reproduction, affect the health of organisms, and raise the death rate in the population.
Explanation:
As Environmental Resistance increases, population growth slows and eventually stops.
Answer:
They divide the Earth into 4 geographical sides. The lines can help travelers and people for this reason.
Explanation:
<h3>Technically, photography has changed in that digital imaging has matured and advanced image making creativeness possibilities and quality beyond what most people could conceive 20 years ago.</h3>
<h3>Professionally, the advent of easy to use digital cameras and unlimited shooting for essentially free has basically destroyed the professional photographers’ ability to charge a relatively living wage for work. A few still command decent prices, but the digitization has created commoditization, which alway equals pricing deterioration.</h3>
<h3>The way we view images has changed from open and inviting prints on refrigerators, desks and walls; to email snap shots that must be opened to participate and that we invest 5 seconds in viewing before terminating them.</h3>
<h3>As with every industry that has been impacted by digitization, great disruption has occurred. Sometimes for the better as in expanding the top one percent of creatives and in potential image quality. Most times in diluting image quality by diluting the talent pool with mediocre uncommitted practitioners. (Like adding water to good wine, the more water the less desirable the wine. Taste, personality, and care are wasted by the dilution.)</h3>
<h3>Socially, the so called democratization of photography through digital has diluted the commitment to quality image making. Many people are just happy to get an image, even when they are beyond mediocre.</h3>
<h2>
<u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u>Confirm</u><u>.</u><u> </u></h2><h2>
<u>#Brainliest</u><u> </u><u>Answer</u><u> </u></h2>
Sociological perspective can be conceptualized as the ability of an individual to connect with a social cause or with an institution, and the connection goes beyond that individual's personal experiences and runs away from what he learned during his life within the society in which he accustomed. In this case, a person is able to analyze and understand other people's lives and the problems and situations they experience. In other words, this term refers to the ability to understand and analyze situations that are not common in our life, but that are in the lives of others.
I see sociological imagination happening in my life, when I am able to understand the problems generated by racism, despite being a white person who has never suffered racism in his life.
