Answer:
Hi I am fine and you what's your name where are you from
If purchasing power parity holds, when a country's central bank decreases the money supply, its <u>If purchasing power parity holds, when a country's central bank decreases the money supply, its price level (rises/falls) and its currency (appreciates/depreciates) relative to other currencies in the world. </u>
A theory of exchange rate determination and a means to compare average prices of goods and services between nations is purchasing power parity (PPP).
According to the hypothesis, fluctuations in the spot exchange rate are caused by importers' and exporters' actions, which are prompted by variations in prices across nations.
Alternatively, PPP contends that changes to a nation's current account may have an impact on the value of the currency's exchange rate on the foreign exchange (Forex) market.
In contrast, the interest rate parity theory postulates that fluctuations in the exchange rate are caused by investor actions (whose transactions are reported on the capital account).
The "law of one price" as it pertains to the overall economy is the foundation of PPP theory.
Hence, option A and D is correct.
To learn more about PPP here
brainly.com/question/27463586
#SPJ4
Answer: C. Colombia has an absolute advantage producing coffee, and Cuba has an absolute advantage producing oranges
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Colombia spends 2 hours producing coffee and 6 hours producing oranges, and Cuba spends 3 hours producing coffee and 1 hour producing oranges.
Since Columbia spends a lesser time producing coffee and Cuba spends a lesser time producing oranges, it means that Colombia has an absolute advantage producing coffee, and Cuba has an absolute advantage producing oranges.
Answer:
The correct answer is (d)
Explanation:
The first amendment has given political parties the right to speak and do political campaigns, and it had restricted government to stop them. Overall, the first amendment right is protecting political speeches and political campaigns. So, yes the first amendment right has demoted all the limits which restricted political parties to get funds from corporations.
Answer:
1.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec. 31 Bad debt expense $9,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts $9,000
Working
= 3% * 300,000
= $9,000
2.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec. 31 Bad debt expense $12,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts $12,000
Working
= 1% * total debt
= 1% * (900,000 + 300,000)
= $12,000
3.
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec. 31 Bad debt expense $12,500
Allowance for doubtful accounts $12,500
Working
= 6% * Accounts receivable
= 6% * 125,000
= $7,500
As the Allowance account is in debit, it means that bad debt exceeded the allowance so this balance needs to be added to properly cater for bad debts.
= 7,500 + 5,000
= $12,500
