Answer:
First answer: "...yearn to accomplish activities others have never done before
".
"Tyron is excited by the "path not taken." Exploring the unknown and trying to accomplish what others have never done before. " Charismatic leaders such as Tyron yearn to go where no one has before.
Second answer: "...dramatic and unique". The text says that they are great actors (hence "dramatic) and significant in positive ways (hence unique).
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
During the decline, the Roman army had been severely weakened to the
point where invaders that could have previously been defeated by the
Empire were eventually able to destroy it. Ultimately, the Roman Empire
collapsed because of "the general failure of its armies to perform the
tasks that were required of them." One reason for the breakdown of the
army was that the Roman legions would fight in civil wars over their
choices for Emperor because they were unhappy with the weaker Emperors
that were frequent in the later Roman Empire. "These struggles served as
an irresistible invitation to German and other enemies to break into
the distracted provinces." Although the civil wars served as a
distraction to the Roman army, the wars also had a detrimental effect on
the army because they damaged its manpower, both in quality and
numbers.
The Roman army during this time was divided into the high
quality soldiers, called the field force, and the lower quality
soldiers, referred to as the frontier force, who did not fight as much
as the field force. The frontier force was mainly deployed to local
garrisons that were not as volatile as the places where the field forces
fought. Because of the civil wars between the legions and the battles
against outside invaders and enemies of the Western Roman Empire, the
field force was considerably weakened and greatly reduced in number.
The field force had to take second-rate soldiers from the frontier
force, thus lowering the quality of the army. The waning quality of the
Roman army was not its only concern; there were also not a sufficient
number of new soldiers being drafted. all the info is in there thank litpick.com i didnt write this
Answer:
portfolio assessments
Explanation:
Portfolio assessments -
It refers to the proper collection of the works of the student , which is given as home work or classwork by the teacher , is referred to as portfolio assessments .
The teachers is asked to collect the work for a period of time , in order to track the improvement of the student in a proper manner .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is portfolio assessments .
Answer:
Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.
Explanation:
The medulla is the hair core that is not always present. ... Hair can best be characterized as originating from an animal be examining..... Both the medulla and cuticle. T/F: Two hairs from the same head may not have the same morphological characteristics.
