Answer:
public compliance without private acceptance
Explanation:
However, when they were with the confederates who sometimes gave an obviously wrong answer, 76% of participants gave the wrong answer at least once. This suggests that Asch's studies are an illustration of public compliance without private acceptance.
Answer:
Deductive Reasoning
Explanation:
The given condition is an example of deductive reasoning. Two arguments are related that bring a valid conclusion given the conditions hold true to both.
Deductive Reasoning: Process of making logical arguments by facts and logic.
Deduction:
Condition 1--- Jason can run 100 meter in 15 seconds
Condition 2--- Sarah is faster at racing any distance
Conclusion--- Sarah can run 100 meter in less than 15 seconds
Reason: Since Sarah is faster than Jason in any race therefore she can win run faster than him at any given condition. Jason runs 100 meter in 15 seconds which means Sarah can run the same distance in less than 15 seconds as she is faster than him.
WR- colon/o and suffix: scopy<span>
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Supply and demand should be thought of together. Suppose you need a hairbrush. You go to your local pharmacy and ask one of the clerks if they stock hairbrushes. They say no they don't. If the pharmacy is supposed to have hairbrushes and they don't, then the supply side does not meet the demand. That's too little supply.
So next you try the nearest grocery store and they say "Yes. For you it's $2.99."
Now you represent the demand, and the store represents supply. They have the hairbrush you want. But the store won't stock hairbrushes if in the last year, you are their first customer who wanted a hairbrush. You still provide the demand, but there is no supplier. So you go without a hairbrush.
The same thing can happen to the supply side. The store has 25 hairbrushes. You only want one. There are too many brushes on the supply side. The store, if they do that with everything, will go broke. Too much supply is just as bad as not enough.
