1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
2 years ago
5

Before reading, good readers often ask themselves questions related to the story they are about to read. Have you ever felt like

you were better than someone else? Have you ever felt that someone else was better than you? What would life be like if everyone was the same? Will Mark Brainliest. ​
English
1 answer:
stiv31 [10]2 years ago
8 0
I think it is part of human nature to constantly compare things to be better or worse- it comes from an evolutionary advantage we possess that allowed us to quickly decide what’s best for survival and wellbeing. So, comparing ideas, objects, and people is a natural response to seeing 2 different things. I have felt that I was better than someone hundreds of times in my life. It is a daily occurrence. However, this has never stemmed from an ego that I try to fuel by making myself feel superior, it is my perception of a fact that I can clearly see. For example, if a friend and I were cooking the same dish and their dish comes out tasting significantly worse than mine, the first thought I would have is “I’m a better chef.” This doesn’t mean I’m invalidating their entire human experience by saying I’m better, it means that I am better than them in one aspect that they could very well improve in.

I have equally felt less than someone else. Not because I’m insecure of my standing compared to them, but because I have flaws and aspects of life that I can improve in. I may be a good chef compared to my friends, but standing beside my mother, I feel like whatever skill I possess is minimal.

If everyone were the same, there would be no individuality. With this, comes a society that doesn’t grow. Innovators, artists, producers, thinkers, inventors wouldn’t exist because there would be nothing separating them from everyone else. The power we hold as a society is a direct result of our differences and acceptance of the fact that millions of people will be better than you at one thing and worse at another. Therefore, it is absurd to feel that you as a person are a better human than someone else: “Better than” is not a term we can use to compare humans; functionality varies across thousands of things a person could possibly do in their life.
You might be interested in
Which event led to the popular artistic movement ukiyo-e?
pickupchik [31]
I think the answer is A
4 0
3 years ago
Read the expert from “the willow wren and the bear”Which evidence best supports the conclusion that the story Was written for ch
cluponka [151]

Answer:

D. The characters are talking animals.

Explanation:

The story of "The Willow Wren and the Bear" is one tale from the Brother's Grimm's story for children. This story tells the war/ fighting between the animals of the forest and the willow-wrens who are considered to be the royal  birds in the forest.

As given in the excerpt, the story has animal characters who are able to talk and act like any human being. They are also fighting against each other, just like humans do at times of war. This <u>characterization is also known as personification where the non-human characters are given human attributes</u>. This <u>personification or animation of the animal characters, who talk and fight and plan and kill each other shows that the story was written for children.</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Who got Questioncove
Xelga [282]

Answer:

Explanation:

What you mean

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it important to know how to interpret a remainder
arlik [135]
So that you can know what to do with the remainder
8 0
3 years ago
“Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” is a classic story of good vs. evil. In such a story, the characters that drive the plot are the hero and the
valina [46]

Answer:

I do not think they should be the villains. Thye just wanted to be the rulers of ther home. After all the garden was theres before it was a garden. Yes they are the antagonists but it is there home. It is not fair that snakes get such bad reps just because thy are snakes.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Paragraph #3: The quotation is an example of a metaphor and hyperbole. Explain why.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following are English sentence patterns
    9·2 answers
  • Why does Blackie’s mother say that he is “sometimes quite undog-lik
    6·1 answer
  • Which is the most accurate statement of the purpose of the media piece
    14·1 answer
  • In a paragraph, explain Jonas's reaction to all of the new information
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think several states left the United States? why would you leave?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a part of the first Republican Party platform?
    13·1 answer
  • Interactions between British, Indian, and Kafiristani cultures: Include two additional specific examples from the text.
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone want to talk? ill be waiting
    6·2 answers
  • I can do all things through christ who strengthens me meaning.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!