Answer:
Intuitive decision making
Explanation:
Intuitive decision making is a kind of decision making method that uses the least rationality and is usually based on past experiences. It is more of unconscious decision making and works outside of conscious thoughts, however it doesn't always contradict rational decision but can somehow complement it. Albeit influenced by emotions, experience has shown intuitive decision making works most of the time. It does not however eliminate the need of rational decision making.
The limiting factor that can involve a person's feelings about his own weight or ability is : Motivation
in most cases, the only thing that greatly affect the self confidence of an overweight person is their own motivation. Whether it's the motivation to get out from their current state or the motivation to focus on their goals while ignoring other's negative feedback,
hope this helps
Answer:
Mrs. Wilson and Mrs. Smith are sisters. Mrs. Wilson lives in a house in Duncan and Mrs. Smith lives in a condominium in Victoria. One day Mrs. Wilson visited her sister. When her sister answered the door, Mrs. Wilson saw tears in her eyes. "What's the matter?" she asked. Mrs. Smith said "My cat Sammy died last night and I have no place to bury him".
Explanation:
The answer is achievement stage. The period in the late teenagers or that in the vicinity of 20 and 30 years old can be said to be the Achievement Stage. An individual finishes his/her instruction and enters this stage. The natural weight convinces the youngster to utilize the critical thinking capacities, learnt in the avaricious stage in an objective guided manner to encourage accomplishment of free social working. This stage speaks to the period amid which the individual applies the obtained learning in circumstances, which have significant outcomes for accomplishing long haul objectives. The insight displayed in such conditions is like that used for satisfying the instructive errands. It should, notwithstanding, be noticed that watchful consideration is to be given on the critical thinking process, due to the long haul nature of the outcomes.
Four cases that support affirmative action are Swann v
Charlotte-Mecklenberg County Schools, Brown v Board of Education, Grutter v
Baller, and United Steelworkers of America v Weber. Meanwhile four cases that
oppose affirmative action are Regents of the University of California v. Bakke,
Adarand Constructors v. Pena, Gutter vs. Bollinger, and Parenting involved in
community schools v Seattle school district.
