Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
The correct answer that will describe Tammy is that she is
likely to have a high self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is defined as a belief or
ability of an individual in regards of having to be able to be succeed in
certain task or situations that he or she is in.
Hey there!
Racial inequality is when there is not bias towards any one based on race.
In A, the bank offers different interest rates for Asians. This is not fair to other races, so it is racial inequality because it is biased towards or against the Asians, depending on the interest rates.
In B, the man deliberately chooses to pull over the Hispanic woman, which is biased against her because of her race. This is racial inequality.
In D, the company gives lower premiums if one is white, which is biased towards them, which is not an example of racial equality.
In C, the restaurant will not allow smoking, which is not biased towards any race, but simply trying to avoid smoking. There is racial equality because they will seat anyone.
Therefore, the answer is C. a restaurant that will seat anyone but does not allow smoking.
I hope this helps! Have a great day!
Hello. You forgot the answer options. The options are:
(A) One of his most famous achievements was the construction of the Great Wall of China.
(B) Legalism is all about achieving order, so these reforms fit with those beliefs.
(C) They were especially upset when he banned history education and called for book burning.
(D) Like Shang Yang, Li Si also fell out of favor after plotting to place someone else on the throne.
Answer:
(C) They were especially upset when he banned history education and called for book burning.
Explanation:
The section shows Li Si's rise and fall as a great Chinese leader. During the reading, we learned how he used the legalistic ideas in his favor and how the policies established by him, were very inspired by the legalistic concepts. Li Si did not have a good relationship with Confucian scholars, who also did not like him, because in addition to disliking the criticisms they made, they were offended when Li Siproibiu the teaching of history and ordered the burning of books.
Explanation:
que tenga un buen día,,,,
