Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
The Gupta empire.........
I guess about $70,000 a year.
Hope this helps!
The #2 is <span>Afghanistan. </span>
Culture in which truth and knowledge are sought through faith or religion is "ideational culture".
Ideation is the activity of thinking of a thought, similar to when an animation light shows up over somebody's head. In the event that you envision a flying vehicle and consider how to make it, that is ideation. When a culture derives its truth and knowledge through faith or religion, that culture is referred to as “ideational culture”.
