the answer is A. Hope I could help
“Idk but best of luck finding your answer”
Answer: Negatively
Explanation:
Enlightenment ideas were not completely against monarchs but did have problems with the absolute nature of the rule of said monarchs.
Before Enlightenment, monarchs generally ruled as they pleased with the logic being that they had the right to rule from God and so had the right to control the nation as their personal property.
Enlightenment was against this and instead espoused the logic that a monarch was only able to rule due to a social contract signed between them and the people whereby they would be allowed to rule provided they took care of their subjects.
Monarchs reacted to this with negativity because it meant that they had to stop being so selfish with resources and had to share power with the people. As time went on however, and with constant pressure on them, they had to relent and it led to the dissolution of several monarchies in Europe and the transition of others to Constitutional Monarchies.
Answer:
The dot-com bubble (also known as the dot-com boom, the tech bubble, and the Internet bubble) was a stock market bubble caused by excessive speculation of Internet-related companies from 1995 to 2001, a period of massive growth in the use and adoption of the Internet. During the heady years of the tech boom, incorrigibly frank Sophia Young lucks into a job that puts her directly in the path of Scott Kraft, the eccentric CEO of Treehouse, a studio whose animated films are transforming movies forever. Sophia of Silicon Valley.
Explanation:
hope this helps its all i got sorry if not
The answer is "it is described as social control".
We can define social control formally as Outside authorizations upheld by government to keep the foundation of confusion or anomie in the public eye. Social control which infers the social intercourse is controlled as per built up and perceived gauges, is complete, supreme and successful to empower request, train and commonality; and to dishearten, and if require be, to rebuff the aberrance.