Although it can be persuasive, a logical fallacy is detrimental to an argument.
This fallacy consists in arguing that a conclusion is false because an argument given for it is bad. There are two main ways for an argument to be bad:
- At least one of the reasons given for the conclusion is bad―that is, false.
- The reasoning of the argument is bad, that is, the reasons given do not support the conclusion strongly enough to meet the burden of proof.
Answer:
Positive or Favorable: When Luke first got his balanced brand
Negative or unfavorable: Landfills are over flowing with garbage, The penny has out stayed it's welcome, Just because a few famous people, Competitive eating is not a sport
Neutral or Objective: Single-use bottled water is commonly, A professional Manicure, The approximate life span of a penny, Speed eating also known as competitive eating
Explanation: Just finished the USATESTPREP for this and i got the answers
Plz give me 5 stars
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
In the poem, the phrase "sill of shade" refers to _____. The narrator of this poem is _____.
First Blank Choices:
A. The edge of time
B. The edge of a hill
C. The loss of a life
D. A Window Sill
Second Blank Choices:
A. The athletes father
B. A reflective onlooker
C. The athlete's lover
D. A young athlete
Answer:
1)C
2) B
Explanation:
The expression "sil of shade" is an allegory that represents the end of life, that is, death. This shows that the poem brings a reflection on the moment when life is finished, how this end is inevitable and it is not possible to escape it. This reflection is passed on to the reader through the words of the speaker of the poem, who is also reflecting, which shows that he is a reflective thinker.
Answer:
None of my answers are really defined- but I hope this helps either way :3
1) The participle in that sentence is "had the" or "had the clerk"
2) It is a past participle
3) The participle phrase may be "seen such a focused man"
The answer is B. the author could be found as a traitor because of the nature of the content. Political pamphlets often dealt with issues and topics that went against the current government. As such, anyone who disagrees and possibly incites rebellion would be viewed as a traitor and therefore would publish anonymously to keep their head.
