Before the development of new criticism and formalism, the common approach to interpreting literature was traditional literary criticism.
Traditional Literary criticism was used before the development of formalism and new criticism to interpret literature. Traditional literary criticism focuses on the author's biographical information and how it influences the work.
This criticism ignores reader response and focuses upon the author, time period, and text alone. Traditional literary criticism places the text back into the period which it came from in order for the reader to better understand the intent of the author.
Hence, before the development of new criticism and formalism, the literature was was interpreted by traditional literary criticism.
To learn more about the traditional literary criticism here:
brainly.com/question/301493
#SPJ4
The answer is Science – Practitioner Gap. This is because there
is a division between psychologists who believe that it should be primary
science versus those who believe that clinical practice should be primary be an
art. The Gap into science practitioner sometimes can make chaos to its modern
clinical practice.
Answer:it is the decrease in response to a stimulus
Explanation: for example a new sound to your environment like a ringtone that becomes distractive
Because the middle kingdom was a time for knights and all these new stuff for the egyptians that they needed to stay alive through the middle kingdom
Shinto: Believes in nature spirits called Kami!
Buddhism: emphasizes meditation to reach enlightenment
Confucianism: emphasizes loyalty, discipline, and order
Daoism: emphasizes harmony with nature.
