The majority of chemist would not find the claim that this form of helium did not release the same number of neutrons as other helium credible because :
The chemists claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence ( B )
The claim made by the chemists is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence because nuclear fusion is the reaction between two light nuclei to form heavy atomic nucleus ( one or more ) . during the reaction between the nuclei the release or absorption of heat reflects the differences in the masses of the reactants and product. It is not dependent on the amount of neutrons released.
Hence we can conclude that the claim is not credible because the Chemist claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence.
Learn more : brainly.com/question/18545784
Hey!
Your answer is B (You're correct)
Have a great day!
Answer: Yes
It is possible to tell if the bacteria on the lb plate are ampicillin resistant just by looking at it because of the presence of colonies. This would indicate that ampicillin has lost its ability to effectively control or kill bacterial growth for it continues to multiply despite the presence of therapeutic level of ampicillin. Moreover, bacteria become resistant by gene mutation and by acquiring resistance from another bacterium through the widespread misuse of antibiotic.