That of a person who often rides a bike....thus option C is correct.
<h3>What is the conclusion of the given passage?</h3>
A normal person who is going to peddle work in the bike lane on the busiest road gives his point of view on the advantages of bikes and why his town should invest more in the bike lanes.
The person who often rides bikes describes his point of view regarding the advantages of the bike and why the town should invest more in bike lanes. He describes how safe it feels.
Learn more about the passage on bike lanes here:
brainly.com/question/16540012
#SPJ1
Answer:
Once there was a very valorous king. His aim was to protect his people, to expand his state boundaries and acquire more wealth by defeating neighboring countries. He spent many sleepless nights in order to execute his plan.
But after some years at a very young age he started developing health issues. He contacted many doctors. But in vain.
One day he met his Spiritual teacher and asked him to show the path of peaceful life. His spiritual teacher advised him to visit a farmer in a small village.
The king went to farmer and stayed at his place. Soon he learned that farmer though not having much wealth was leading a happy and peaceful life with his family.
The king again went to his teacher and asked him about this. His teacher with a smile on his face stated," the difference between both of you is that your family is your whole state and the farmer's family is only his wife and children. He has to take care of only three to four people whereas your task is to take care of a large number of people. More responsibility, more uneasiness of mind."
Explanation:
is it halpful
The answer is C),
Why? Well, as Atticus said, killing a mockingbird is a sin, as they cause no harm and just sing harmonies.
The correct answer is A) effect. The verb is 'to affect', but the noun is 'effect'. You can affect someone by doing something, or you can have an effect on them.
The correct answer is <span>what is written in the Constitution is not open to interpretation
Strict constructionism is a way of interpreting the constitution. Constructionists only accept what is written and the way in which it was written. There is nothing beyond what is written and from his point of view, if it says that all people are equal and citizens of the United States then all people indeed, including African-Americans. For him, there is no interpretation that looks at deeper meaning, what is written is what is intended and that's why he is a strict constructionist. </span>
