Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, Lincoln was realistic when he twice said, "we cannot separate." With this statement the Lincoln clears his aim and idea that the United states will not be divided into Unions and Confederation. By saying twice the statement the Lincoln means that he will not allow to divide at the country at any cost and for that purpose he will declare a war if needed. He knows that the country will be united with struggle and sacrifice.
Your Answer Just Might Be....
Jaskier
Answer:
Explanation:
I can't resist the question.
Man is born into enduring suffering. Most of us suffer at the hands of betrayal. Be thankful it is nothing more serious like the suffering endured by the victims of the Holocaust. The victims are dead and the survivors feel a life long guilt for not being among them. Betrayal is much easier to take, but it is very painful because trust and innocence are usually what is challenged.
Fatalism would say we suffer because we are on a path that would lead to where we are. The main characteristic is that there is no choice. We would meet that event no matter what we try to do. So for betrayal, it is absolutely inevitable. We cannot be protected from it.
Determinism is compared to free will. If we believe in free will then at every junction, we can do something that will avoid the suffering. Determinism like Fatalism would say this is incorrect. The difference is the determinism is much more rigid. Fatalism sometimes gives an escape hatch. Not often, but it does happen.
Humanism is more the study of why the suffering occurred usually it has nothing do with external blame. We do not say we suffer because our best friend told our secrets to everyone. We ask. instead, why we found it necessary to share those secrets in the first place. If we loose trust, we do not blame others for what is no longer ours. We ask ourselves why we mourn what we gave away.
The Bible. This one is the hard one. There are two examples that you should be familiar with. One is Christ. The other is Job. One has to do for the payment of sin, and the other has to do with the desires of a truly evil entity (Satan). Since I am not that qualified to comment on either, I find I can offer more questions than answers. Satan wanted to prove to God that man was an imperfect being susceptible to temptation. Man could always be "had." It is a book of endurance -- how many can overcome adversity.
Our suffering would be much more severe without Christ's sacrifice. He gave his life so that ours would be much better. I can't put it much simpler.
It formed a new government in France and ended with a lot of nobles dead.
