1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
3 years ago
10

If Jeff Bezos gave everyone in the world 1 million dollars would he still over a billion dollars?

History
2 answers:
Yakvenalex [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Looked at a different way, if you rounded up Bezos' fortune to the even $200 billion stated in the post, and apportioned it evenly among the world's 7.8 billion people, each one would get about $25. Bezos, as one of those 7.8 billion, would be left with just $25

Explanation: So maybe not....

Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

"It opened: Jeff Bezos has 121 Billion dollars. The Population of earth is 7 billion people. He could give every person 1 BILLION dollars and end poverty, and he would still have 114 billion dollars left over but he won't do it."

You might be interested in
List the main factors that agriculture depends on​
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

Environmental factors that influence the extent of crop agriculture are terrain, climate, soil properties, and soil water. It is the combination of these four factors that allow specific crops to be grown in certain areas.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which continent is smaller in land area than europe or australia?
krok68 [10]
Hey bud...

none of the continent is smaller than Europe and Australia.

They are listed last in the rankings of largest to smallest in land area.

hope it helps...!?!?!
6 0
3 years ago
What two factors led to a larger workforce available to new industries?
Strike441 [17]

Answer:Several factors led to the rise of U.S. industrialization in the late 1800’s. New technologies like steam engines, railroads, and telegraphs made communication and transportation easier. The ability to source and transport materials across the country with ease turned many local businesses into national companies. Workplace innovations, such as the assembly-line method of production, allowed these companies to produce goods on a mass scale.

Expert Answers info

Queen Langosh eNotes educator | Certified Educator

First, we should be clear about the nature of the industrial boom that occurred in the wake of the Civil War. It was the rise of heavy industry and the production of capital goods that characterized the early phases of industrial growth during this period, and by far the biggest factor contributing to growth was the expansion of the railroads.

Railroads expanded exponentially after the Civil War, and their rapid spread facilitated and spurred industrial growth in several ways. They led to a demand for coal, timber, and especially steel, the most important commodity in this new industrial age. They connected markets, enabling businesses like the meatpacking industry to rapidly increase distribution and production. Moreover, their corporate structures formed a paradigm and a model for other industries.

In addition to this new industry, which spawned many others, industrialization was fueled by the massive influx of immigrants from Europe and elsewhere that provided a large industrial labor force. Another factor was the rapid proliferation of new technologies, a cause and an effect of industrial development. Electric light, assembly lines, the Bessemer steel process, and the telephone were just a few of the myriad innovations that helped spur industrial growth.

A final, often-overlooked factor contributing to industrialization was the role played by the federal government. In the wake of the Civil War, the government spurred the growth of railroads by setting aside massive grants of land, providing subsidies, and other measures. The government also established high tariffs and created a generally pro-business economic climate that facilitated industrial growth.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the death of Darius important to Alexander conquest of Persia
AleksandrR [38]
<span>Kings at the time usually didn't have heirs to the throne, because of this by killing the king you bring confusion to the country. No one knows what to do and everyone wants to be the new leader. So the king dying was a great chance for Alexander to take over Persia.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 15 POINTS! Read the section, Watching a Play. Describe the scenery and props used in Shakespeare's plays.
    15·1 answer
  • To help curtail rising unemployment and inflation and stimulate economic growth, Kennedy
    10·2 answers
  • What did China call itself
    12·1 answer
  • The Byzantine influence can be seen in Kiev’s government because the legal code was created on the basis of Byzantine law. the j
    7·2 answers
  • A wave of mergers peaked between 1897 and 1904. The largest of these mergers created the first billion dollar American corporati
    10·1 answer
  • Pplllsss hheellpp! asap!
    15·2 answers
  • I REALLY NEED HELP!!!:(((((
    9·1 answer
  • 1.1. O território da América espanhola foi dividido conforme os interesses econômicos e as realidades encontradas pelos espanhói
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Seminoles differ from John Ross's Cherokee tribe in their
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following situations accurately describe "democracy"?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!