Answer:
1 billion $ worth in damage
Explanation:
Hello. You forgot the answer options. The options are:
a. Jurisdiction over the Wizard internet.
b. Jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
c. Jurisdiction over the plaintiff only.
d. Both jurisdiction over the Wizard internet & jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
Answer:
d. Both jurisdiction over the Wizard internet & jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lawsuit.
Explanation:
It is necessary that the Montana court has all the information possible to understand the case and to judge it correctly without expressing errors or confusions. In this case, the court must have and interpret all jurisdiction over Wizard internet, understanding all the elements presented, as well as must have and interpret jurisdiction over the whole subject of the process.
The answer is a. It goes to a conference committee
Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
