Answer:
D. She later changed her mind about the women's rights movement and fought against women obtaining the vote.
Explanation:
Elizabeth married Henry Brewster Stanton, had children, she also had a close connection with Susan B. Anthony, and she was also a driving force behind the Seneca Falls Convention. But she never once in her history changed her mind about the fairness of women's right to vote. She always contributed onto it.
(I'm 80% sure of that)
not perfect tho lol
Answer:
RETROACTIVE INTERFERENCE
Explanation:
There are two kinds of retroactive interference. Proactive and retroactive. Janice falls under the proactive category. Proactive interference suggests that previously learned skill affects a new skill. Having learned French in the morning, she could not effectively articulate the Spanish that was learned in the afternoon.
Answer:
changes in human genetic characteristics
Explanation:
Since the Flynn effect sees the increase in IQ scores with factors directly impacting: changing communicating technologies- This means people are engaged in more intellectually demanding activities in the context of learning, updating and managing information.
Similarly, with increased opportunities for educating, learning comes at the hands of most people, and this enables a general population to become more skills in scoring a higher IQ.
Other development factors, like having better nutrition, will account for brain development and will lead to manifest as people more capable of dealing with abstract reasoning. If the reduction in family size coincides with having a better quality of life, then people are expected to become more proficient and score higher.
The changes in human genetic characteristics are the least related since normally the changes in genetics last too many time frames and they are not the focus of interest that the Flynn effect can measure. The rest of the options can be traced during a lifetime.
Answer:
It illustrates the plato stage. When the love and affection are stabilized and the couple does not feel excitement or urgency for each other anymore.
Explanation:
<em>First the couple was extremely passionate, with a natural addiction, because of the dopamine activation in the brain area. No wonder people says love is a drug. </em>
<em>However, the dopamine levels discrease after some time, and the couple can experience the plato stage, when passionate love fades and a more mature form committed of feeling takes place.</em>
<em>The couple tends to develop companionate love, which is a lot different from the lustful frenesi of the begining of the relationship.</em>
I would say D because I think that best represents a foreign policy.
